European plaice (Picton & Morrow, 2015)
A recent study of plaice after capture and release from a beam trawl determined that vitality scoring can be used to predict post-release survival (Uhlmann et al. 2016). Vitality scores included observation of reflex impairment and injury.
Figure from Uhlmann et al. 2016.
The authors conclude: "Our results illustrate that a vitality score and TL were the most relevant explanatory variables to predict post-release survival probability of plaice. In agreement with other post-release survival studies (Yochum et al., 2015), 14 d of post-release monitoring was appropriate to capture almost all fishing-related mortality events. Although one fish died after 21 d, > 60% of mortalities occurred within the first 4 d. Reflexes of both plaice and sole were sensitive to capture stress, in particular air exposure, although some of the differences may have been related to an observer effect."
The authors noted reservations about scoring vitality: "As with other animal behaviour scores, reducing a continuous spectrum of responses to presence/absence observations to improve practicality (Cooke et al., 2013) require a well-defined protocol, and assessments of bias, especially when multiple observers are involved (i.e. inter-observer reliability, Tuyttens et al., 2014). Although scoring binary as opposed to ordinal or continuous responses removes some subjectivity in interpretation (Tuyttens et al., 2009), it may still persist by abstracting from a continuous scale (Tuyttens et al., 2014)."
Uhlmann et al. (2016) comments about binary scoring expose a misconception about vitality scoring using the RAMP approach. For RAMP, presence or absence of individual reflex actions and injuries are given a binary score and then summed to derive an ordinal or continuous vitality score, representing the sum total of impairment. The vitality score is then correlated with survival or mortality for samples of animals (Davis 2010, Stoner 2012).
Future research is suggested to refine the vitality method: "Further research is needed to disentangle the effects of observer, and expectation bias on reflex impairment scores, especially in studies where more than one scorer is involved. Accuracy of scores may also be improved, if researcher handling periods before reflex (and injury) assessments are kept consistently as short as possible. Finally, the utility of RAMP as a proxy to predict post-release survival will depend on both laboratory-based and field calibration studies where key technical, environmental, and biological drivers of post-release survival are included."
